Site Feed

contact me


my Flickr

Sad Salvation Fotolog

Super Karate Monkey Fist

Costume Checklist

Home

Technorati Profile

Reads

Imaginary Year

Invisible City

Raccoon

It Is What It Is

Aaron's Weblog

CraBlogged

Me(ish)

faisal.com

Adventures in Trouble- shooting

Sugary Sweet Machine

San Jose Blogs

Daily C

Random Curiosity

Elkit in Wonderland

Ego, Ego, Ego!

GuysBlog

Sci-Fi Hi-Fi

Intricate Plot

Torches Over the Wino

is that all there is?

BotzBlog

are you there god? it's me, margaret.

Dahlshouse

post-hip chick

Kadavy.net

Mike's Blog

Zeigen

ALL ART BURNS

Slacy's Blog

Paul's Time Sink

Disorderly Content

fling93 loves fishies

UnNatural History

Munich-
maedchen


Introspection/ Extroversion

derf content, blog-style

antwon.com

SF Bay Bloggers

San Francisco Bay Area Journals

The Bay Area Is Talking

Random Blogs

Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?

Inactive

Photo-a-day

Better Than Reportingly

Sans Sheriff

House Band

Here Are The Facts You Requested

Other Things

Jeremy's Superfun Portal of Mystery

Invisible City

Angela's Daily Planet

Bob Pence

Peter Conrad

biscoRADIO

Powered by Blogger Pro™

Welcome to Sad Salvation. Day by day by day by day ... this is my attempt to make sense of the world.



Current | Archives


Saturday, December 13, 2008


What happens when everyone is p2p

I wonder if peer to peer networks will cost us all more in the end. Right now peer to peer networks are meant to use an efficiency in the system. Right now most people do not use all the bandwidth that their internet providers offer them. Using a peer to peer system is a quick and easy way a service provider like skype can make the most of that unused bandwidth.

I wonder what will happen when people have three or four peer to peer systems running at all times. Will this clog up the net? Will people have to pay more for more bandwidth? At what point will peer to peer cost customers the money it is saving the service providers? How will this effect the business models around these testers? I do not hear these questions being asked often enough.

Labels: ,


Thursday, February 15, 2007


Zero Impact, Staring the RIAA

According to a new study P2P effect on legal music sales "not statistically distinguishable from zero". I did not see that one coming. I always thought the impact was low, but I never thought it was as low as zero.

This means the music industry is losing more money putting DRM on music than it is saving by keeping sales. This is money that could be coming to the labels bottom lines. This money could be helping you. Instead you are wasting it. Just think of all that money you wasted suing people using P2P networks. That must have been a pretty penny.

I know that the music industry will come out against this report. They will say it is cutting into their bottom line. They will say that something has to account for the lack of sales. It could not be that the music coming out sucked and that the people running record labels are out of touch. It could not be that you had no idea how to promote your music on the internet until Myspace dropped. I think I am going to believe the study.

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, July 16, 2003


Steal This Idea

It is going to be interesting to see who will win the P2P arms race. My money is on the file swappers. I no longer swap files because I do not want to be sued. My bet is that the RIAA business model will run out before the file swappers will to trade.

I will say here that I do not swap files using a P2P service. I just feel that the RIAA is going the wrong way about stopping it.

Labels: , ,

 

Current | Archives

Contact me