Site Feed

contact me


my Flickr

Sad Salvation Fotolog

Super Karate Monkey Fist

Last FM profile

Home

Technorati Profile

Reads

Imaginary Year

Invisible City

Raccoon

It Is What It Is

Aaron's Weblog

CraBlogged

Me(ish)

faisal.com

Adventures in Trouble- shooting

Sugary Sweet Machine

San Jose Blogs

Daily C

Random Curiosity

Elkit in Wonderland

Ego, Ego, Ego!

GuysBlog

Sci-Fi Hi-Fi

Intricate Plot

Torches Over the Wino

is that all there is?

BotzBlog

are you there god? it's me, margaret.

Dahlshouse

post-hip chick

Kadavy.net

Mike's Blog

Zeigen

ALL ART BURNS

Slacy's Blog

Paul's Time Sink

Disorderly Content

fling93 loves fishies

UnNatural History

Munich-
maedchen


Introspection/ Extroversion

derf content, blog-style

antwon.com

SF Bay Bloggers

San Francisco Bay Area Journals

The Bay Area Is Talking

Random Blogs

Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?

Inactive

Photo-a-day

Better Than Reportingly

Sans Sheriff

House Band

Here Are The Facts You Requested

Other Things

Jeremy's Superfun Portal of Mystery

Invisible City

Angela's Daily Planet

Bob Pence

Peter Conrad

biscoRADIO

Powered by Blogger Pro™

Comments by: YACCS

Welcome to Sad Salvation. Day by day by day by day ... this is my attempt to make sense of the world.



Current | Archives


Thursday, April 26, 2007


Dodgeball, Is it useful here?

Buzz twittered a story about dodgeball being down. (God that sentence shows what kind of geek I am). The story goes into the fallout between the dodgeball founders and Google. The founders left Google and many people think that Google will now let dodgeball die.

This whole story is interesting to me. I am a dodgeball user, but I do not find dodgeball to be all that useful. I think I can count on one hand how many times it has been useful twice in a month. I know part of this is because my friends do not really use it. If I knew more people using it, I might get more out of it. Of the 14 people on my friends list only about 6 of them use it regularly.

One of my pet peeves with dodgeball is that they never made San Jose or Silicon Valley its own city. Most of the time I get dodgeballs from people in the city going to bars. This is not very useful to me. I am not going to run up there just because I got a dodgeball.

Dodgeball had the feeling of a fad for me. In 2006 lots of people used it, but now it seems that people use it less often. Even if the people who do use it, use it sparingly. It is a service that one person cannot use alone.

Since I started using dodgeball I do not think they have added any features. I do not think it has become more useful. I do not know if that is a problem with the concept or if that is a problem with what Google was willing to do with it. I am not sure what social mobile computing looks like. What I know is that terrain has something to do with it. What you can do with social mobile computing is different in New York City and a rural area. It might be different in every city in America. I wonder if that scares a company like Google.

Twitter is an interesting idea to look at. I turn off the messages going to my cell phone, but it would kill my 500 messages a month. It is halfway mini blog/mobile social service/time waster. It is very much like the never ending cocktail party. It is not like you are really getting to know anyone, but you are listening to them try to be witty.

I am trying to think about what would make an interesting service, but nothing comes to mind. I guess if something did come to mind I would be working on it right now.

Labels: , , ,


Saturday, September 16, 2006


What is Web 2.0

I was at the SFlickr meetup and ... was asking people for a definition of Web 2.0. At first no one could define it. I said that web 2.0 is just tags. The were only one succinct answer, Web 2.0 web sites are focused around user contributed content.

I was struck at how easy that answer was. If I think about the Web 2.0 sites that I use, they are about about user content. Look at YouTube, Yepp, del.icio.us, dodgeball, Upcoming.org, and Flickr. All of the interactions on these sites are about users sharing information. There is nothing to share information about if there is no content.

I think something has changed in the way people have been using the internet over the last two years. About four years ago users started to take control again. Now websites are trying to fine way to give users control in ways that are useful. I think that is what Web 2.0 really is.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Sunday, June 25, 2006


Dodgeball

I have been using dodgeball for more than four months now. I can say that it has been useful a total of once. That is crap. Most of the time Dodgeball is good for showing me where my friends in San Francisco are hanging out. I am not going to just get in my car and drive 50 miles because I got a text message.

The system is set up to be used in a city, not in an area like the Bay Area. It would be nice for the text messages to tell me what city the venue is in, instead of me having to figure it out on my own.

The other problem is that few of my friends around San Jose use it. I have no idea of how to get more of them to use it. I guess them knowing what coffee house I am hanging out in is not such a big draw for people. I have friends who are signed up but never use it. I am not sure how I can get them to use it.

I hear (third or forth hand) that Buzz Anderson says Dodgeball is the perfect geek social tool. You can tell people what is going on without them having to commit to anything. I guess I want it to be a bit more useful. Right now it is doing nothing to help my social life.

Labels: , , , , , ,

 

Current | Archives

Contact me